Protocol configuration
Institutions configure which protocols, prompts, and fields are active. Configuration is versioned and reviewed; it is not modified by the platform at runtime.
datasyteAI™ in a few short answers.
The platform behind AiMediQ™. It brings clinical context together, applies the hospital's own protocols, and coordinates what the team sees.
datasyteAI is the platform that synthesizes clinical context, applies institution-configured protocols, and coordinates the workflow surfaces used by AiMediQ™ — a clinician-in-the-loop system, not an autonomous one.
datasyteAI is organized as five coordinated layers wrapped by a shared governance rail. Each layer has a defined scope; the boundary between layers is where governance is enforced.
Conceptual architecture diagram. Sensitive implementation details are not disclosed publicly.
Assembles a structured, time-bounded view of an event from approved inputs so the clinical team can maintain situational awareness during a resuscitation.
Institutions configure which protocols, prompts, and fields are active. Configuration is versioned and reviewed; it is not modified by the platform at runtime.
Provides structured inputs for time-based calculations that clinicians commonly perform under pressure. Values are confirmed by the clinician before use.
Clinician confirms every value. The platform never executes on the patient.
Captures time-stamped actions and observations aligned with resuscitation documentation fields, reducing post-event reconstruction load.
Prepares deidentified, institution-scoped summaries to support debrief, QA, and registry reporting workflows.
Conceptual timeline · deidentified · not a live view
datasyteAI is designed to support qualified clinicians and never to replace them. Governance is a property of the architecture, not an afterthought.
Designed to integrate with standard institutional identity systems; specific providers confirmed per deployment.
Structured event data is being prepared for downstream integration with institutional clinical documentation workflows. [CLAIM REQUIRES APPROVAL — specific systems pending.]
Reporting formats and endpoints will be confirmed with pilot partners and registry stakeholders.
A multi-site coordination pattern is under design exploration. Not offered as an available capability.
A short summary of the documented practices we operate today. Detailed procedures are shared with institutional partners under appropriate confidentiality.
Models, prompts, and protocol configurations are versioned. Each production surface is traceable to a specific reviewed version.
Operational metrics — availability, latency, and configuration state — are monitored. Clinical-outcome monitoring is scoped to the institution's evaluation plan.
Changes follow a defined internal change-control process with review, testing, and staged rollout appropriate to the surface being changed.
Defined internal procedures cover triage, communication, and remediation. Institution-specific escalation paths are agreed as part of deployment.
Security and privacy are institutional decisions. Our role is to provide a platform that respects them by default.
Full Security & Privacy overviewOnly fields required for the supported workflow are collected. Free-text and identifying information are avoided where structured fields will do.
Data handling, residency, and retention are defined per deployment with the institution's privacy and security teams.
The platform does not train or fine-tune models on patient data outside of an explicit, approved research and privacy arrangement with the institution.
Find answers to common questions about our technology and services
Request a technical briefing to walk through architecture, integration patterns, and governance with your clinical, IT, and compliance stakeholders.